01
Traditional Ayurvedic evidence
Classical use informs inquiry. It does not replace modern evaluation — it directs where careful research should look.
Science hub
Ayulogy evaluates ingredients across tradition, mechanism, and human research — then communicates findings with the same care used to formulate.
Evidence hierarchy
We do not assign arbitrary numerical scores. Evidence is described qualitatively by study type, relevance, and limitations.
01
Classical use informs inquiry. It does not replace modern evaluation — it directs where careful research should look.
02
Laboratory and pathway studies help explain how a botanical constituent might act. Mechanism is informative, not conclusive for outcomes.
03
Controlled human studies are weighted most heavily for formulation decisions, with attention to extract, dose, duration, and population.
04
Every ingredient dossier includes safety considerations and explicit research limitations. Uncertainty is disclosed, not smoothed over.
Formulation
A disciplined path from botanical identity to finished delivery — designed for consistency, clarity, and trust.
Source
Botanical identity and responsible sourcing.
Standardize
Marker compounds measured for consistency.
Validate
Analytical checks against specification.
Formulate
Evidence-informed composition and delivery.
Test
Third-party testing and batch documentation.
Deliver
Stable, transparent products for daily living.
The Ayulogy Standard
01
Traditional knowledge, mechanistic insight, and human research — weighed with equal honesty about limits.
02
Identity-confirmed botanicals with defined marker compounds wherever formulation requires it.
03
Formula tables, testing status, and documentation designed to be readable — not hidden.
04
From raw material to finished batch: controls for identity, purity, and consistency.
05
Formulas meant to support modern rhythms — calm, clarity, recovery, and daily balance.
Ingredient library
An architecture built for botanical identity, traditional context, modern research, and citations — without fabricating evidence.
Transparency
Transparent formulation and testing — designed so you can see the work behind every formula.
Standards
Prefer “studied for,” “research suggests,” and “traditionally used for” over absolute medical claims. Citations connect to PubMed, DOI, and clinical literature as dossiers are curated.
References
Each evidence item can hold title, authors, journal, year, DOI, PubMed ID, study type, population, intervention, dose, duration, outcome, limitations, and URL. We publish curated peer-reviewed and authoritative sources only — never fabricated citations.